Conflict Escalates, Oil Prices Moon: How Will Crypto React?
History tells us that geopolitical shocks are often shown as a case of "short-term pain for long-term gain."
Trade here:
The Chaos of the Last Few Days
On February 28, the U.S. and Israel launched a joint military operation codenamed "Epic Fury." A massive airstrike on Iran wiped out core leadership, including Supreme Leader Khamenei. Iran retaliated instantly, moving to choke off the Strait of Hormuz.
There is no secret that the Strait of Hormuz is the world’s most important oil artery, carrying about 20% of global supply. In the world of energy, when the Strait closes, prices go parabolic.
Within just one week: Brent Crude jumped 28% to $92.69; WTI crude skyrocketed 36% to $90.90, marking its biggest weekly gain since 1983.
By March 9, the situation went from bad to worse. A drone strike took out Saudi Arabia's largest refinery, Kuwait slashed production, and Iraq’s daily output dropped by 1.5 million barrels. Oil smashed through the $100 barrier. Iran even upped the ante, warning that if Trump isn't reined in, oil could hit a record-breaking $200.
On March 10, Trump declared that the war was "basically over". Coupled with the G7’s plan to tap into strategic oil reserves and hints from the IRGC about reopening the Strait, these glimmers of hope helped stock markets claw back some losses. Oil began to cool off, with Brent crude retreating to the $85 mark.
By March 11, the time of writing, the International Energy Agency (IEA) proposed the largest emergency oil release in its history, sending Brent crude further down toward $80 per barrel.
The key takeaway: Last week’s "decapitation strike" did not actually rattle oil prices that much. What really sent the market into a tailspin was the realization that Trump’s "quick fix" rhetoric was spinning out of control. That’s when the panic-buying truly began.
Crypto Markets: Dip, Bounce, Dip Again
When the conflict first broke out over the weekend, Bitcoin did what it always does in a crisis — panicked first, recovered second. The whipsaw has been covered in detail in "US-Iran Tensions Boil Over: How War Rewires the Crypto Market".
Then came the plot twist. Instead of winding down after the targeted strikes, the Middle East conflict escalated further, forcing Trump to admit the military operation would drag on for 4 to 5 weeks. Markets took one look at that headline and sold off again.
This "dip to bounce to dip" pattern is practically a playbook at this point. Every major geopolitical shock runs the same script.
Here is a cruel truth regarding Bitcoin: it would not be trade like gold. It trades like a leveraged bet on dollar liquidity.
The "digital gold" narrative has stuck around for years, but when real chaos hits, Bitcoin's first instinct is pure risk-off panic, instead of safety. This also happened on March 12, 2020, with COVID fear wiping out 50% in a day, and on August 5, 2024 while the JPY carrying trade unwinds, Bitcoin cratered alongside the Nasdaq.
Same story this time. On February 28th, as the conflict erupted, Bitcoin flash-crashed toward $63,000. Weekend + war headlines = no liquidity with maximum fear.
The short-term read: War is noisy. Between Trump's contradictory statements, shifting military objectives, and oil supply headlines dropping every few hours, calling the next move is mostly a coin flip. What is predictable: volatility stays elevated. Buckle up.
On the macro side, the market currently anticipates a 97.4% probability that the Federal Reserve will maintain interest rates unchanged in March, with the timing of the first rate cut in 2026 now delayed from the initial expectation of March to the latter half of the year. High oil would lead to sticky inflation, causing the Fed to hold the rate remain. That is a tough environment for Bitcoin as well as other cryptos.
Opportunity in Crisis
While many observers are focusing on painting a doomsday scenario, yet the clues noted are less gloomy..
The first note would be Bitcoin’s drawdown, which is holding up much better than most would have expected.
The relevant observations have already been detailed in WEEX's previous article, US-Iran Tensions Boil Over: How War Rewires the Crypto Market, without further elaboration.
Second, how will the market price change once the dust settles?
History shows that while Bitcoin’s gut reaction to geopolitical shocks is usually a wave of forced liquidations, its long-term trajectory almost always runs counter to that initial panic. In a nutshell, the "dump-then-pump" logic remains undefeated.
Third, what if the war continues?
If the conflict in the Middle East becomes a prolonged affair, the focus will shift to the duration and intensity of the hostilities, as well as the actual recovery of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Crucially, if the global economy takes a significant hit, it would pave the way for the Fed to pivot toward more dovish monetary policies—which, ironically, would be a massive tailwind for Bitcoin.
This is the "counter-intuitive" bull case that Arthur Hayes recently highlighted. It is a complex domino effect with plenty of "if", but history proves that it has been a path the market traveled before.
The Future of On-Chain Narratives
Every upheaval in the established order presents a prime opportunity for decentralised assets to demonstrate their worth.
Interestingly, the biggest winner of this conflict is not Bitcoin, but stablecoins and RWA (Real World Assets).
During wartime, straits are alternately blockaded and opened. Nations impose price controls or deliberate on releasing oil reserves. Ordinary citizens bought gold and crude oil, or began transferring assets.
This is where stablecoins and on-chain protocols prove their worth. Their value is simple but profound: Permissionless, Trustless, Borderless, and 24/7.
Ultimately, this Middle East conflict has emphasised the dual nature of crypto. Bitcoin remains a high-beta play that swings with global liquidity. However, stablecoins and RWAs have proven themselves to be the Pragmatic Tools of Decentralization in times of chaos.
At this stage, "cautious optimism" beats "blind pessimism". After all, markets eventually stop pricing in the fear itself and start pricing in the recovery.

