Secured over $60 million in funding from Dragonfly, Sequoia, and others, learn about the on-chain derivatives protocol Variational | CryptoSeed
Author: momo, ChainCatcher
Recently, the decentralized derivatives trading platform Variational announced the completion of a $50 million Series A funding round led by Dragonfly. Including three previous funding rounds, Variational has raised a total of $61.8 million. The investment lineup behind it is quite luxurious, including well-known institutions such as Sequoia Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Bain Capital Crypto, Hack VC, and others.
According to data from DeFiLlama, the open interest (OI) on Variational has exceeded $810 million, which still has a significant gap compared to Hyperliquid's $9.4 billion, but OI currently ranks fourth among on-chain derivatives protocols.
In the fiercely competitive decentralized derivatives space, why has Variational been able to continuously attract top institutional bets? What is the team's background? What are the differentiated paths? This article provides a brief overview.
What is the team's background?
From the perspective of team background and entrepreneurial experience, Variational and Hyperliquid have many similarities; both are graduates from prestigious universities, come from quantitative trading backgrounds, and transitioned from founding quantitative funds to building on-chain derivatives platforms.
However, unlike Hyperliquid's early mysterious and anonymous team approach, Variational disclosed the backgrounds and entrepreneurial experiences of its founding team in its white paper.
Variational was co-founded by Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu. CEO Lucas graduated from Columbia University and was primarily responsible for trading system engineering architecture; Edward Yu is a quantitative analyst with a Chinese background. The two met while studying and researching in the engineering department at Columbia University and co-founded the quantitative hedge fund Qu Capital in 2017.
In 2019, Qu Capital was acquired by Digital Currency Group. Subsequently, the two joined Genesis Trading: Lucas served as Vice President of Engineering, and Edward Yu served as Vice President of Quantitative Trading.
According to the white paper, before leaving Genesis in 2021, the team they were part of had handled trading volumes of several hundred billion dollars. After leaving, they founded their proprietary trading company Variational and completed a $10 million funding round.
In the following years, the team operated proprietary trading strategies while completing trading interface integrations with mainstream CEX and DEX. Later, the team began to develop and operate the Variational Protocol based on its trading business and system experience.
Additionally, members of Variational's development and quantitative team come from technology and quantitative institutions such as Google, Meta, Virtu Financial, IMC Trading, and Jane Street. The white paper states that core technical team members generally have over ten years of experience in software engineering or quantitative research.
What are the product features? How does it differ from Hyperliquid?
From the Variational trading interface, the differences from Hyperliquid are not very significant. The platform has launched approximately 450 trading pairs, mainly covering two categories of assets: cryptocurrencies and TradFi, providing users with up to 50 times leverage trading capability. The TradFi segment is currently in the beta testing phase, and according to official disclosures, the TradFi market will launch over 100 trading pairs.
However, Variational stated in its press release that it has a clearly differentiated positioning from Hyperliquid.
Variational mentioned that its model is more like a brokerage rather than another Hyperliquid-style exchange. Its target users are not limited to crypto-native traders but aim to provide a trading experience for on-chain derivatives that is closer to traditional markets through zero-fee trading and liquidity aggregation.
Currently, Variational operates on Arbitrum, adopting a dual product line model. The Omni version is primarily aimed at retail users, focusing on aggregating liquidity from multiple sources for perpetual contract trading products, while Pro targets institutional over-the-counter derivatives trading.
The biggest difference from Hyperliquid lies in the order matching and liquidity mechanism. Hyperliquid relies on its own L1 chain and a public central limit order book (CLOB), where market makers or HLP vaults within the protocol compete for quotes, and traders must pay maker/taker fees. In contrast, Variational uses an RFQ (Request for Quote) model, with a single liquidity provider as the counterparty, not relying on internal market making on-chain but aggregating external liquidity in real-time from CEX, DEX, over-the-counter trading channels, and traditional financial market makers, managing risk through hedging.
The reason for choosing this differentiated path is that Variational CEO Lucas believes that on-chain liquidity is still far behind traditional trading venues like CME, and the order book model has a "cold start" problem. By aggregating liquidity externally, there is no need to rebuild liquidity from scratch on-chain.
What stage is it currently in? What participation opportunities are there?
Variational is currently still in the Pre-TGE stage, and the $VAR token has not yet been issued. The project had planned to conduct its TGE in Q1 2025, but this has been postponed, and the official has not yet announced a new exact TGE date.
In December 2025, Variational launched the Omni Points rewards system. The official stated that 50% of the $VAR supply will be used for community incentives, gradually distributed through various mechanisms such as Points, rather than a one-time airdrop.
In terms of points, 3 million points have been retroactively awarded to early users, and points will be distributed every Friday thereafter, calculated based on the trading snapshot from the previous week. The points program will conclude no later than Q3 2026.
Currently, the main participation opportunity is to engage in perpetual contract trading on the Omni platform, with trading volume being the core factor for earning points. Holding positions and referring others can also earn additional point bonuses.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.


