Vitalik emphasized in a post that Ethereum must be "amazing," but the foundation is not the center
Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher
After experiencing a series of negative events such as the continuous departure of core members and former core supporters criticizing the project, Ethereum founder Vitalik had to publish a lengthy response to the community today to quell public opinion and inject more confidence into the community.
In fact, all the negative doubts essentially stem from the decline in ETH's price. Compared to the strong performance of Hyperliquid, Ethereum lags behind in ecological prosperity, community belief, and main chain performance, resulting in its price dropping by more than 64% in the past year at most. In contrast, HYPE's price has repeatedly hit new highs, surpassing $64 at its peak.
As a result, the Ethereum community has directed its main criticism towards Ethereum's core contributor: the Ethereum Foundation. Many opinions suggest that the strategic formulation of the Ethereum Foundation is vague, with frequent upheavals in leadership, and not only has it not increased its holdings of ETH but has also continued to sell coins, failing to represent the interests of ETH holders.
Ryan Sean Adams, co-founder of Bankless, stated in a post on May 20 that Ethereum's future can no longer rely on the Ethereum Foundation (EF). "While EF is important, Ethereum needs new institutions to intervene and fill the gap. We need an organization that truly hopes for the success of Ethereum assets (ETH) — growth in quantity — and is willing to speak out and execute effectively. EF is not that, and it never will be."
Tempo researcher and former Ethereum Foundation researcher Dankrad Feist shares a similar view. He stated a few days ago that the Ethereum Foundation currently holds less than 0.1% of all ETH, with no funds flowing to it from Ethereum staking or transaction fees. The way to save Ethereum lies in the community creating an organization that aligns with Ethereum's economic interests and is accountable for them.
Veteran crypto journalist Laura Shin further pointed out that the original sin of Ethereum lies in the fact that every step since Dencun has not considered token economics, meaning that the Ethereum Foundation has overly focused on ideology while neglecting capital markets and price performance.
In response to these criticisms, Vitalik addressed the community's concerns in today's lengthy article with an honest and firm attitude, systematically elaborating on his deep thoughts regarding the role, strategic direction, and value positioning of the Foundation.
1. Facing the "Sense of Crisis": Ethereum Cannot Become "The Second Google"
Vitalik began by acknowledging a sense of "distress" — he often sees people saying: "Vitalik talks about Ethereum needing to be decentralized, needing privacy, needing to be a refuge technology, the words sound beautiful, but why do EF's actual actions not reflect these?"
He further admitted that there may be a "real difference" between his sense of crisis and that of others in the community — in terms of "which type of criticism I value most and which type of critic can hit my pain points the hardest."
To illustrate, he gave a meaningful analogy: Google. Vitalik believes that Google is a success story, "but one could also hold another view: they had a beautiful and idealistic start, but at some point, the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they gradually abandoned the 'don't be evil' motto."
He stated: "If you took me back to around 2008 and gave me a button that could raise Google's 'dogma' standards by one or two standard deviations, such as granting Richard Stallman a permanent veto over certain key policies, I would not hesitate to press it."
The reason is that the entire tech industry is drifting away from the early idealistic foundation of "don't be evil," "turning to chase financial interests, embracing the grand narrative of accelerating superintelligence that devours everything, being infiltrated by unscrupulous individuals, and cowardly yielding to government pressure in terms of ideological control, surveillance, and war." Therefore, "having a company do something different, positioning itself as the 'irrational person' as George Bernard Shaw said, resisting the tide of the times, is more beneficial for freedom, power balance, and the stability of society as a whole than all large companies succumbing to mainstream trends."
This discourse has actually set the tone for the future of the Ethereum Foundation: it will not become the second Google — it will not slide into mediocrity and corruption step by step after an idealistic opening.
2. EF is Not the Center, but a "Node with Clear Objectives"
In response to external criticisms regarding the Foundation's positioning, Vitalik provided a clear framework: EF is not "the center of Ethereum," but rather "a node with clear responsibilities alongside other nodes." He said that within the Ethereum ecosystem, "even within EF, there are many who wish for us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure we become the latter."
The necessity of this shift lies in a harsh financial reality: EF holds only about 0.16% of all ETH, "less than many individual ETH holders," while in other blockchains, it is common for "central foundations" to hold 10% to 50% of the shares. Vitalik further pointed out that EF was originally designed to complete the limited scope of work defined in the token sale documents, which was fully completed in 2022, "it was never designed to be an eternal manager."
Therefore, Vitalik stated that EF will choose to use its remaining resources to pursue long-term goals rather than blindly expanding. EF will clearly focus on activities that are crucial for Ethereum's success as a censorship-resistant, capture-resistant, open, private, and secure system, and that would not happen without their promotion. He particularly emphasized that EF will no longer continue to sell large amounts of ETH.
3. Ethereum Must Be "Amazing"
Vitalik put forward a clear viewpoint in the lengthy article: Ethereum must be "amazing."
"We live in an era of highly intelligent AI and various technological accelerations. 'Maintaining the status quo of EVM, hard forking once or twice a year to meet users' short-term needs' is unimaginative."
But for some, "amazing" means 250 milliseconds of latency and 1 million TPS. Vitalik bluntly stated: "I think it would be a mistake for Ethereum to go down this path. Pursuing speed and scalability while being only slightly better in decentralization is a path to mediocrity, and if we do this, we will inevitably fail."
He believes Ethereum should strive in another dimension — that is the CROPS dimension:
First, a provably bug-free Ethereum. About six months ago, "all network security researchers would have thought this was an absurd and impossible goal. And now, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification, it is on the verge of becoming a reality."
Second, high availability of chain consensus. Vitalik emphasized that Ethereum will continue to be the only chain that possesses both the traditional BFT security attributes (high fault tolerance in asynchronous networks) and Bitcoin's PoW security attributes (resisting 49% attacks in synchronous networks) under streamlined consensus.
Third, minimizing intermediaries. "Frankly, protocols like smart contract wallets and railgun must send transactions through intermediaries to go on-chain, which is embarrassing and has always been a weak point." He admitted, "Just achieving 50% does not make Ethereum impressive in the CROPS dimension. So we must pursue 100%."
This "irrational" technical insistence is, in fact, a response to veteran journalist Laura Shin's criticism: Ethereum has not ignored token economics, but is trying to achieve the highest capital premium by establishing extreme "certainty."
4: How to Bridge the Gap of "Interest Alignment"?
Looking back over the past decade, Ethereum has experienced the bursting of the ICO bubble, the DeFi winter, rampant hacking, and multiple bear market impacts, but ultimately completed its self-evolution.
Today, Vitalik's reflection on the Foundation has garnered widespread attention, not only because he responded to external criticisms but more importantly, because it sends a signal: the Ethereum Foundation is gradually transitioning from a past technology-oriented organization to a mature institution that balances organizational governance, ecological coordination, and long-term strategy.
For an ecosystem managing hundreds of billions of dollars in on-chain economic activity, this transformation may not be any easier than any hard fork upgrade.
Lucas Tcheyan, vice president of research at Galaxy, expressed firm support for ETH, stating, "The market is repeating the same mistakes with ETH, just as it did with SOL in 2022/2023. The executive changes at EF are concerning. But Ethereum's roadmap looks more coherent than at any time since the merge."
However, after the Ethereum Foundation further reduces its scope of responsibilities, regarding the viewpoint of many industry professionals that the Ethereum ecosystem needs to create an "organization that aligns with Ethereum's economic interests and is accountable for them," Vitalik and the Ethereum Foundation did not respond to this issue, and the market has not yet seen a viable solution.
This gap of "interest alignment" may be the key to ETH reversing its decline.
You may also like

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade
Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
